- Prior to 2007, as Head of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) David Walker said that the U.S. economy was unsustainable and made some remarkable claims regarding fiscal irresponsibility
- David Walker runs investigative arm of congress
- Walker believed that the biggest peril facing the nation was being ignored
- Walker argued that current standard of living was unsustainable
- Walker called it the dirty little secret that in Washington everyone knew
- He concluded that politicians were guilty of fiscal irresponsible
- After trying to argue his case, he gave up on elected officials and took to the streets to present the facts
- He embarked on what he called a "Fiscal Wake Up Tour"
- Walkers compares the fiscal irresponsibility to charging expenditure to a credit card and expecting our grandchildren to pay for it
- Argues that we are living in fiscal denial
- The Government has committed itself to massive entitlement programs that we cannot afford
- 78 million baby boomers reached sixty-two and started retiring in 2008
- Walkers maintains that the status quo was a tsunami ready to swamp the republic
- Biggest challenges are social care and Medicare
- Heath care problem is much more significant than social security
- When Medicare was expanded in 2005 by including prescription drug coverage, Walker regarded the move as fiscally irresponsibe
- The new legislation would extend debt to over eight trillion dollars in the near future
- The country cannot afford the promises that it has made
- The system is unsustainable
- Can expect people to disagree, but hardly anyone does except for a small group of economists that say that problem overstated
- Fed Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stated that growth alone is unlikely to solve the country's fiscal challenges
- Walker calls the behavior fiscally immoral
Your source to global events that impact the economic recovery and other musings for the not so faint-hearted.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Government Official Warned on US Economy in 2007
EU Parliament Approves Controversial Hedge Funds, Private Equity Rules
QUICK VIEW
- European Parliament committee has approved the European Union’s controversial hedge fund regulations in the form of a new bill
- European Parliament will seek to impose strict new reporting and custody rules on hedge funds and private equity funds, as well as possible leverage and borrowing limits
- The bill includes the so-called “passport” that would give foreign hedge funds that meet certain requirements access to all 27 EU countries
- Members of the British Conservative Party voted against the measure.
- Hedge funds accused of exacerbating the Greek debt crisis by betting on its default
- Private-equity firms accused by politicians in Germany of stripping the assets of the firms they bought.
- Measure could constrain European pension fund returns and bring about retaliatory measures against the EU from other countries
A key European Parliament committee has approved the European Union’s controversial hedge fund regulations, but appears to have have set up a battle with the bloc’s finance ministers at the same time.
The Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee gave its assent to the Alternative Investment Managers Directive, which would impose strict new reporting and custody rules on hedge funds and private equity funds, as well as possible leverage and borrowing limits. But the bill headed to the full Parliament includes the so-called “passport” that would give foreign hedge funds that meet certain requirements access to all 27 EU countries. That provision was not included in the version of the directive approved today by the EU’s finance ministers.
Members of the Parliament are claiming that reception of the proposed bill by the European Parliament does not appear to be free from resistance. Jean-Paul Gauzes, a french member of the Parliament claimed that negotiations will be fast-tracked, “but that doesn’t mean an accord at any price.”
Hedge funds have been accused of exacerbating the Greek debt crisis by betting on its default, while private-equity firms were accused by left-wing politicians in Germany of acting like "locusts," by stripping the assets of the firms they bought.
The committee passed the bill by a vote of 33 to 11. Notably, members of the British Conservative Party, which took power alongside the pro-European and pro-hedge fund regulation Liberal Democratic Party last week, voted against the measure.
“We’ve adopted protectionist, fortress Europe policy,” Syed Kamall, one of the Tory MEPs, said. He warned that the measure would both hurt European pension fund returns and bring about retaliatory measures against the EU from other countries, such as the US.
The move for further regulation follows a decision by European leaders at a summit in Berlin in February 2009. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, has been a strong supporter of increased oversight in the hedge fund industry.
The Future of the Euro
- European Union trends
- Euro crisis in Greece
- Monetary union constraints in high inflation or deflation
- Role of European Central Bank in balancing needs of high growth and low growth economies
- Contrasts between Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Germany, France, Italy and countries which more recently joined
- Loss of sovereignty to Brussels
- Political issues in controlling budget deficits or imposing budget cuts on an unwilling nation
- Political unrest and threat of strikes or instability
- Challenges for the future